Christian science monity full#
Feldstein has alleged, and the record would seem to support, that his application for employment was not given a full consideration because he was not a Christian Scientist. In April, he was notified by a Church Personnel Representative that his application for employment as a reporter had been rejected. Those who meet this requirement and are otherwise *976 qualified will be hired, promoted and transferred without regard to their race, national origin, sex, color or age.įeldstein filed his application with the Church in March of 1979, together with a copy of his curriculum vitae, letters of recommendation, and a portfolio of newspaper articles that he had written. References are sought from "two Christian Scientists who can comment on your character and your practice of Christian Science." The application closes with the following statement: The First Church of Christ, Scientist, may by law apply the test of religious qualifications to its employment policies.
Christian science monity free#
a member of the Mother Church? A branch Church member? Class taught?" "Are you free from the use of liquor, tobacco, drugs, medicine?" "Do you subscribe to the Christian Science periodicals?" "Are you a daily student of the lesson-sermon?" and inquiries directed to the applicant's present and past religious affiliation. The employment application, used for positions throughout the Church, contains several questions relating to religious practice, including "Are you. Feldstein nevertheless requested and obtained an employment application for a reporter's position. He indicated that he was not, and was informed that he would stand little, if any, chance of becoming employed by the Monitor as a reporter, as only Christian Scientists were hired except in the rare circumstance that no qualified member of the Church was available. Upon making his inquiry, Feldstein was instructed to contact the Personnel Department of the Church, where he was asked if he was a member of the Christian Scientist Church. At that time, Feldstein was a college student interested in pursuing a career in journalism. In January of 1979, Feldstein inquired at the Monitor whether there would be job openings on its news reporting staff upon his graduation from college in June. The undisputed facts in the case are as follows. The defendants bring their motion on several grounds: first, that the Monitor is a religious activity of a religious organization and is therefore entitled to discriminate in its employment practices in favor of co-religionists second, that as a result of the Monitor's status, this Court is prohibited from inquiring into the presence or absence of a religious character in particular jobs and finally, that the plaintiff's constitutional challenges to Title VII's treatment of religious activity, and specifically his challenge to the 1972 amendment to section 702 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. The matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for summary judgment. § 2000e et seq., by the plaintiff, Mark Feldstein, against the defendants, the Christian Science Monitor (the Monitor), the First Church of Christ, Scientist (the Church), and the Christian Science Publishing Society (the Publishing Society). This matter arises from a suit brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Kilmarx, The First Church of Christ, Scientist in Boston, Boston, Mass., for defendants. Moore, Gaston Snow & Ely Bartlett, Boston, Mass., June Y. Dershowitz, Cambridge, Mass., for plaintiff.ĭouglas F. The CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR the First Church of Christ, Scientist and the Christian Science Publishing Society, Defendants.
0 kommentar(er)
